"Even in normal fertile couples, the chance of pregnancy is approximately 25% in a given menstrual cycle."
These are numbers for IVF cycles using fresh embryos from non-donor eggs (that would be Dave and I) in women younger than 35 (REACH posts results for other ages, etc. on their website).  
Number of cycles in 2006:  285
- 54.4%  cycles resulting in pregnancies
 
- 46.1%  cycles resulting in live births
 
- 51.3%  retrievals resulting in live births
 
- 56.6%  transfers resulting in live births
 
- 35.1%  transfers resulting in singleton live births
 
- 36.8%  pregnancies with twins
 
- 3.2%  pregnancies with triplets or more
 
- 38.0%  live births with multiple infants
 
- 2.1  average # of embryos transferred
 
What does all this mean?  Dave and I have a roughly 56.6% chance at a live birth using IVF.  Early on our doctor told us we had a 60% chance of success, so that's pretty close to the average.  
Looks like we have a 38% chance at giving birth to twins.  Not just fraternal, but possibly identical (Dave is totally pushing for twins).  Here's a cool BBC News article explaining why IVF increases the chances of identical twin births.  
 
1 comment:
PS - I vote for multiples also. Why not get the bang for your buck? Plus, Dave's a twin so you don't even need to get into the whole "We did IVF and ended up with twins" conversation - just need to say - "it runs in the family"!
Post a Comment