"Even in normal fertile couples, the chance of pregnancy is approximately 25% in a given menstrual cycle."
These are numbers for IVF cycles using fresh embryos from non-donor eggs (that would be Dave and I) in women younger than 35 (REACH posts results for other ages, etc. on their website).
Number of cycles in 2006: 285
- 54.4% cycles resulting in pregnancies
- 46.1% cycles resulting in live births
- 51.3% retrievals resulting in live births
- 56.6% transfers resulting in live births
- 35.1% transfers resulting in singleton live births
- 36.8% pregnancies with twins
- 3.2% pregnancies with triplets or more
- 38.0% live births with multiple infants
- 2.1 average # of embryos transferred
What does all this mean? Dave and I have a roughly 56.6% chance at a live birth using IVF. Early on our doctor told us we had a 60% chance of success, so that's pretty close to the average.
Looks like we have a 38% chance at giving birth to twins. Not just fraternal, but possibly identical (Dave is totally pushing for twins). Here's a cool BBC News article explaining why IVF increases the chances of identical twin births.
1 comment:
PS - I vote for multiples also. Why not get the bang for your buck? Plus, Dave's a twin so you don't even need to get into the whole "We did IVF and ended up with twins" conversation - just need to say - "it runs in the family"!
Post a Comment